I’m talking about stuff thats frequently advertised on podcasts and other episodes of online series like “8sleep” (no idea how its spelled) or AthleticGreens or LiquidIV etc

Edit: is it banned to mention actual names, if not just message person if credible

  • czech@lemm.ee
    23·
    10 months ago

    Ground News. The blind spot feature gives me great insight to where my “out of touch” family is coming from with their political narratives.

      • czech@lemm.ee
        3·
        10 months ago

        I’m not sure because I live in the US but the feed is based on “tags” you select. It seems like they process stories from around the world but I don’t have a grasp on how comprehensive they are, internationally.

    • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
      2·
      10 months ago

      Is something like Media Bias Fact Check or is it different? Can you explain why it’s worth paying for? I keep seeing the ads but I feel like MBFC kinda does the same thing…at least that’s how it comes across in the ads. I’m just curious what it does differently so well to make it worth the price.

      Thanks!

      • czech@lemm.ee
        9·
        10 months ago

        I’m not familiar with MBFC. It may be similar but I don’t mind throwing some $$ at any project making these efforts. What I like about Ground News is that all the sources for a given story are aggregated to one page, sorted based on political bias, and rated on accuracy. That information combined with the “Blindspot” feature (which highlights when a story is disproportionately covered more by one side) is very powerful IMO. It looks like the blindspot feed it’s available to non-subscribers but doesn’t include the political bias of the source: https://ground.news/blindspot

      • czech@lemm.ee
        2·
        10 months ago

        What do you mean? I never really see much about RFKjr but I don’t have him tagged as a topic of interest.