deleted by creator

AKA Volumes are unintuitive. Always get your martinis filled to the brim. https://youtu.be/Mkn3PzdaByY

AI slop image, for this gag?

That show is so dang good.

Assuming they went to college.

This is basically the Laundry Files books by Charles Stross.

Where are they going to find someone older than a member of Congress?

For further reading, see Galaxias by Stephen Baxter.

Hey WOPR, how about a nice game of chess?

YouTube’s spokesperson, Boot Bullwinkle, did not respond when Ars asked if it was possible to know what content triggered the mistaken channel ban or confirm that Sinesvibes had no strikes on record prior to the ban.

Is April early this year?

He’s looking a little harfam, TBH.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Td2x8s9GZlo

They know exactly what it means and how that works. They’re just sorting out how to strangle it in its crib.

A sign that reflects the eternal truth… You don’t buy beer. You rent it.

Glad you enjoyed it! Personally, I never expected such a thing from a sports reporting site.

Nothing left to do but play football.

https://www.sbnation.com/a/17776-football

It’s because they would charge you for air if they could.

How to avoid the empty roll and be sanitary?

Before you sit, always grab a couple squares of paper and wipe the seat. You’ll avoid stray droplets and leftover curly hairs, and if the paper is low you’ll know before it is too late.

You ever stand behind a couple of geezers in line somewhere and they start talking about some random stuff? They didn’t know each other. They were just bored.

The paper explicitly states that they are calling ChatGPT “bullshit” in the Frankfurtian sense and they cite “On Bullshit” as the source for that definition. It’s right there in the introduction.

You’d know this if you had read the paper or even checked whether your statement were true. So either you read it and then lied deliberately, or you didn’t read the paper nor actually care about the truth value of your own statement, rendering your comment itself bullshit in the Frankfurtian sense.

I can’t tell you what dude was trying to say, on account of not being a mind reader.

But each of them were jailed for acts against the states that imprisoned them (one espionage, one enemy combatant). That is the relevant point of comparability: treatment of a foreign enemy.

The pictures show the contrast in how those states treat their prisoners. One leaves their prisoner healthy, and the other leaves theirs starved.

The point couldn’t be clearer.