As of writing this comment you are at +69.
- 1 Post
- 39 Comments
Thanks “big bad China” for forcing the rest of the world to move forward with more open AI (let’s see if it materialises)
This infinite list of letters could be "any random combination of letters EXCEPT when that makes the word “banana”. A subset of an infinite set can still be infinite.
Infinite != all possibilities
MajorSauce@sh.itjust.workstoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world•Small steps make a difference.English1·10 months agoConnect on Android has a few very cool features like keyword/community/domain blocklist!
MajorSauce@sh.itjust.worksto World News@lemmy.world•NATO Report Outlines Growing Climate Risks to Global SecurityEnglish1·10 months agoTreat the symptoms, not the cause.
But in the case of NATO, don’t treat anything.
MajorSauce@sh.itjust.worksto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•OneDrive deleted my files!21·11 months agoYou most certainly are not, but for who it might concern: Never omit to protect this access with a VPN and/or even better ditch FTP and opt for secure protocols like SFTP.
I too found the omission obvious considering that the filthiest examples are right there.
MajorSauce@sh.itjust.worksto HistoryPorn@lemmy.world•Karl-Gerät self-propelled mortar, Nazi Germany, WW2, sometime between 1941-1945English4·11 months agoGaijin plz
America used to have a grand tradition of what to do with tyrants.
Which is the same playbook as democratically elected leaders of foreign nations. Bombs, drones and CIA-soonsored assassinations
MajorSauce@sh.itjust.worksto Privacy@lemmy.ml•EFF Dice-Generated Passphrases | Electronic Frontier Foundation5·1 year agoEven a “traditional” password would have a “list” that attackers could know (all the possible characters that can be used in a password), now compare this set of ±150 characters with the set of possible words that can be used (probably close to 250k per language if you take out some similarities).
Even with only 4 words, the number of possibilities is astounding.
MajorSauce@sh.itjust.worksto People Twitter@sh.itjust.works•Healthcare? Oooo maybe next time...42·1 year agoHey, preventing humanity’s progress out of capitalism by installing authoritarian regimes on potentially socialist countries ain’t cheap!
MajorSauce@sh.itjust.worksto Linux@lemmy.ml•Fedora Silverblue is the most frustrating distro so far2·1 year agoThanks! I had not heard about it.
It seems to only consider GNOME as the official DE and seem to not have the “blend” integrations of different distro.
Might not be for me but I appreciate the reply and it might help others.
MajorSauce@sh.itjust.worksto Linux@lemmy.ml•Fedora Silverblue is the most frustrating distro so far7·1 year agoI’m in the same boat, Kinoite (or rather my own blue build of it) killed my distro-hopping. But fans of Arch might be interested in the upcoming immutable arch-based OS: BlendOS
MajorSauce@sh.itjust.worksto Technology@lemmy.world•Key misinformation “superspreaders” on Twitter: Older womenEnglish21·1 year agoWhat’s your point?
MajorSauce@sh.itjust.worksto Technology@lemmy.world•Key misinformation “superspreaders” on Twitter: Older womenEnglish31·1 year agoUp voted for the well played irony!
The acceleration from gravity would be the same no matter the object mass (~9.8m/s²).
MajorSauce@sh.itjust.worksto Technology@lemmy.world•Microsoft word update messes up exams in DenmarkEnglish52·1 year agoWhile English is most of the time the lowest common denominator, I love to see some variety!
MajorSauce@sh.itjust.worksto Technology@lemmy.ml•Full scan of 1 cubic millimeter of brain tissue took 1.4 petabytes of data, equivalent to 14,000 4K movies — Google's AI experts assist researchers6·1 year agoNot taking a position on this, but I could see a comparison with doing an electron scan of a painting. The scan would take an insane amount of storage while the (albeit ultra high definition) picture would fit on a Blu-ray.
MajorSauce@sh.itjust.worksto World News@lemmy.ml•Shafik authorizes NYPD to sweep ‘Gaza Solidarity Encampment,’ officers in riot gear arrest over 1001·1 year agoI don’t have anything to add, but I wanted to thank you, OP, for the comments/links in the thread.
Yes, the previous commenter just specified that the image should be seen “wide-eyed” (eyes focused on farther away / closer to parallel) than Cross-eyed (eyes aligned like you were looking at something closer).
If you go cross-eyed, the depth is reversed/incorrect since you are seeing the different images with the wrong eye.