• 0 Posts
  • 18 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle


  • If they are incorrect, lying, and don’t realize it, but still arguing in good faith, then their arguments will fall short when challenged. If they are arguing in bad faith, then it’s a different story.

    I’ll admit the claims they made are perhaps overly broad and difficult to challenge, but it is entirely within the realm of possibility that they can back it up with examples / evidence.

    Jumping straight to calling them out is pretty disingenuous. Even if their points are more disingenuous and misleading, you shouldn’t be fighting fallacy with another fallacy.


  • Then engage with the discussion??? It’s very frustrating reading your comments actively shutting down discourse.

    Here I’ll do it for you: I disagree with @opinionhaver because I think that filling stadiums in red and swing states is a tangible metric that is at least correlated with general election support. I think that Trump is even more polarizing than AOC, and so her polarization isn’t as much of an issue as they make it out to be.

    There. Now we find out how substantial their position is when they defend it, instead of just crying about talking points


  • It may be worth it to decide how we define ‘unstoppable force’ and ‘immovable object’.

    An Immovable Object has 0 velocity:

    v = 0

    Acceleration is the time derivative of velocity:

    a = d/dt(v(t))

    a = d/dt(0)

    a = 0

    And we know that

    a = Fnet / m

    An object with infinite mass would satisfy this equation, but an object with no net force would too. We could add a correction force that will satisfy the constraint of 0 net force.

    |Fnet| = 0

    ∑Fi = 0

    Fcorrection + … = 0

    To satisfy Newton’s 3rd law, we would need a reaction force to our correction force somewhere, but let’s not worry about that for now.

    A physics definition of ‘Unstoppable Force’ is:

    |Funstoppable| =/= 0

    In this case the gravitational force fits this description, given a few constraints

    Fg = Gm∑ Mi / xi2

    As long as the gravitational constant G is not 0, our object has mass, and

    ∑ Mi / xi2 =/= 0, then

    |Fg| > 0

    But this does feel kinda like cheating because it’s not really what people mean by ‘unstoppable force’. the other way to define it is just immovable object in a different reference frame.

    a = 0, |v| > 0

    I’m gonna stop here because this is annoying to type out on mobile





  • I feel like faith provides a disproportionate of comfort compared to guidance. People take the parts of religion they agree with, and discard the rest. I actually think this is good practice, but it becomes an issue when they use the affirmation of the broader religion to justify their actions.

    A moral compass is something you have to find for yourself, and acknowledge that it is not backed up or justified by any other entity than yourself.

    For me, I’ve found a good starting point is the TST tenets. Compared to the 10 commandments, they are much more broad. I can use them as a lens to analyze a variety of different situations and organize my thoughts and feelings.

    But that doesn’t mean that I use TST to justify my actions, the tenets are my tools of introspection. Heck, the 7th tenet even acknowledges that the tenets are only guiding principles and seems to encourage finding your own morals.



  • Throw away your vote to a 3rd party?

    Isn’t this situation exactly when you should look to third parties? There is a large group of people who are dissatisfied with the policies of Biden and who absolutely do not want another term of Trump.

    If you vote for either of them, it sends the message that you condone their presidency. If you abstain from voting then it sends the message that you don’t care about government policy and therefore, policy won’t care for your interests.

    If you are a third party voter, aren’t the big parties incentivized to try and win your vote over for themselves?

    I’m probably going to vote for Biden, but you have to wonder at what point does this diametric system break down.


  • Using two or more adjectives doesn’t imply conflation.

    The sentence “You can have a regular apple or a big green apple” doesn’t imply that green apples are big, or that big apples are green. It also doesn’t imply that big green apples are irregular outside of this local phrasing context.

    It just implies that the set of ‘regular apples’ being referenced does not include the instance of ‘a big green apple’

    I can see where the confusion is coming from, this is tricky to explain clearly.






  • Unity actually gives any class with the name GameManager a special gear icon. You cant just forgo the cool gear icon!

    (Its not too terrible from an organizational standpoint because most of the scripts are attached to game objects. MonoBehavior is a component of GameObject. For instance, you’d never have player movement in the GameManager class, you would put it in the component class attached to the player character GameObject.)