

Maybe a commercial offering would be a better choice for you.
Maybe a commercial offering would be a better choice for you.
It’s an open source project, you dig into it a bit and issue a pull request with the documentation.
Stop talking shit about Americans. Focus on the problem actors.
Yes, everyone, check out and just let things happen. Stop participating.
What a sweeping generalization!
I am an experienced cook and use one to produce consistent, on-target results. It more often prevents over-cooking, not under-cooking.
It’s not pure once it starts dissolving or corroding the metal or other materials.
And, if you can sufficiently dry the item (including inside of things), pure water is not a threat to electronics; it’s often used to clean solder flux.
I ‘member when Technocrit was pushing hard against the Harris / Democratic candidacy.
I think he sows division among the Left more than seek any substantive positive outcome.
Or maybe that is a positive outcome for him.
The world does buy a lot of intangibles from the US. Music, software, and service subscriptions come to mind.
Just a vibe check – can you tell me what happened in June 1989 at Tiananmen Square?
I’m not that opposed to this, China has been buying up land around US bases. The CCP is as shady as can be.
There’s no explanation. They achieved their results and moved on to new accounts and new messages.
yes, we do, I need that lumber to build my deck!
Can you reference a source that shows Corningware contains or leaches lead?
Read the instance rules about advertising.
Get a pair of chain mail gloves. Put them on and they turn to gold and still function as gloves.
Then wear my gold gloves around at will, using my gold touch to further materials science.
Do you prefer Soviet, or Chinese, style socialism?
What bad-faith behavior and sockpuppeting looks like:
I gave up on cute or clever names a while ago; now I go with “storage0”, “router0”, “wap00”, “vmhost0”. Always with a numeric suffix because there will be a -1, -2 some day.
not necessarily, just as interpreting assembly to understand intent is harder than interpreting “resultRows.map(r -> r.firstName)”, additional structure/grammar/semantics are footholds that allow the model to form patterns at a higher level of abstraction