It’s to help reduce smurfing in f2p games like the ones mentioned below. (Dota and cs)

It’s good to have a constant in the current world, steam seems okay, I love what they’re doing for Linux gamers, I think they should reduce their share by at least 5%,but they do a good service and seem competent.

Everyone on the outside is definitely wondering what the point was if you guys don’t uphold it.

We thought it was a nuts ritual before but now it’s just cultish.

deleted by creator

Is there an extension I can use to know if a site uses AWS? Their not getting a penny from me.

deleted by creator

The movements between Remy and the human were involuntary and instantaneous, I think we must assume they’re all quantumly entangled.

Every issue I’ve had has been easily fixable with searching and following instructions. There’s not been many issues, and I can do it anyone can.

Works great with steam. I went back on my ethics and played wow classic for a while though and battle.net was a little tricky for me to get going. But yeah steam works perfectly.

I started with pop os 5 years ago and haven’t found a reason to change. I’m not hugely techy and just wanted something to play games on. Had very few issues overall.

I want to like Bill Gates, you’re probably right about PR. Even though I use Linux I still think he’s been a positive for humanity.

Don’t think the op was implying anything other than that food is a lot more complicated than it used to be.

I’ve worked in restaurants with similar issues.

Trying to provide at least 2 vegan options and gluten free options for starters, mains, and desserts without creating an overly bloated menu and decent variety is really a nightmare. Especially when you want to rotate dishes every month or 2.

Do you feel like a comment like that is contributing anything? Or are you just trolling?

Man it’s like you picked 2% of what I said and felt that’s enough…

I counted, I think it’s 89 words and you’re response is as far as I can tell to one word: wife. So between 2-3%.

I agree, but imagine a situation without race involved. If my wife has something taken and chased a child to get it back, then got charged for assault, it’d be laughed out of court.

This could be classed as assault, depending on intention, I think the investigation is looking into her character to prove the intention. Obviously she has a shot character, but they may need subpoenas from judges etc to look at phone records for evidence. It all takes time. I’m sure she’s getting her just desserts eventually.

My original point was that I’m not sure what the NAAPC are planning to achieve, I hope the police can discover enough through eye witness accounts to try her in a criminal court but from what I’ve seen there’s no criminal act; just a shitty person being shit. What scares me the most is the support.

I also heard the child may have had disabilities, which adds a whole new layer.

I don’t mean to be contrarian for the sake of it and I agree with people’s feelings. But the law works in both ways.

Possibly, it needs another source of evidence though. In the video the man asks: " Did you chase him? Did you try to hit him?" The woman replies “Yes”, but it’s a compound question and easily argued she was saying yes to chasing to get back whatever the child took.

Threat of violence is a crime and in this case clearly racially motivated so would be a hate crime. But I think it’d be tough to prove in court with only the video evidence and something for the criminal court to discover, not the parents or the NAAPC.

I’d like to again state this woman is pure garbage and the people that gave her money are probably worse.

You need to look at the difference between a ‘hate crime’ and a ‘hate incident.’ They’re not the same thing. There could be eye witness evidence or other recordings of a crime too, but in that case it’d be a matter for the police rather than the family.

Generally, when a person or group sues someone else, they’re seeking for damages. Such as loss of property, medical bills, reputation which causes loss of work etc. It’s hard to argue what the damages here would be.

I believe the police are also looking into the matter though, so something could come of it, including money to the family.

I agree, but what other crime was committed? I didn’t see anything.