Lvxferre [he/him]

The catarrhine who invented a perpetual motion machine, by dreaming at night and devouring its own dreams through the day.

  • 2 Posts
  • 980 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: January 12th, 2024

help-circle



  • I wish EU4 had more automation, the amount of micromanagement there was awful. And this sort of game is more interesting when you can focus on the big picture.

    Sadly I don’t trust Hipsters’ Electronic Arts Paradox to do automation right. And by “right” I mean:

    • Transparent. You could reasonably get why the game AI will / won’t take a certain decision, without spending hours in the wiki or fucking around the game files.
    • Flexible. The best decision is often circumstantial, and playing styles are a thing.
    • Powerful, but not overpowered. The AI’s decisions should be decent, but not the best - a player who takes the time to learn how stuff works should be rewarded. (Or even better, tweak the AI so it does the best.)







  • What about old style search that does not suck? And by “not sucking” I mean:

    • It doesn’t show you results missing a search term.
    • It has simple and functional Boolean logic.
    • It doesn’t assume = bullshit what you meant.
    • It doesn’t try to answer questions by itself.
    • It is either language-agnostic or respects the language options of your browser.
    • It doesn’t show you “AI snippets” or whatever.
    • It doesn’t take your location into account, unless you explicitly say so.

    You don’t need AI for that dammit.





  • I’m not opposed to A"I"; far from that, I actually use text generators a fair bit, sometimes image gens. It’s simply a technology and I use it as such. And I still bloody hate how corporations handle it:

    • Always two weights, two measures. If you violate their IP, you’re a filthy criminal; if they violate yours, you’re overreacting and a luddite and harming progress. I want to see copyright gone, but if it is not, then apply it consistently to all sides. (By the way, fuck “Open"A"I” and their Bob Dylan defence.)
    • Always nagging you to use it. If you’re nagging me to use something, it’s because it’s in yours best interests that I use it, not mine. No means “no” dammit.
    • Always implicitly lying about its abilities. No, I’m not going to ask it anything where a bullshit answer might ruin my day, stop misleading me to do so.
    • Always downplaying issues. Yeah, nah, I’m not blind to the environmental concerns around training those huge models. Or that corporations - that don’t understand what “consent” means - basically DDoS sites to train their models.

    But of course they won’t talk about this, right? This sort of questionnaire is not made to genuinely obtain feedback; it’s made to mislead you.