mechoman444

Hell ya let that thing burn! So happy for the people and the country. They should be proud of themselves.

Ok now that y’all read thus far. Auschwitz, Alcatraz and a myriad insane asylums not burner down for very good reasons. But an old slave plantation and we’re all smiles…

“other means”

Ya. This was my thought. The straw that broke the camels back type of situation.

Christ on a stick! As someone who builds computers for fun all I see is fan control modules and cables. So many cables. Cables as far as the eye can see!

Removed by mod

You mean people can’t just say whatever they want on Twitter anymore! They’re actually going to get fact checked!

This is true! There no way to know exactly how many miles grover put out in that thing.

Removed by mod

This is true. Omg. I forgot! I haven’t searched for porn in so long! I just to live shows now.

I have this terrible urge to hurdle insults at you but I refrain because I don’t feel like dealing with mods.

No. He’s not right. Not at all. The reason that you and the other person think you’re right is because you’re ignorant you haven’t studied history and the only reason you sound so confident is because you ate a dunning Kruger sandwich.

What you are is effectively a religious manuscript writer during the time of Gutenberg when he invented the printing press. The machine was called heresy because it would have removed the power from the clergy or so they thought in any case.

Any sufficiently impactful technology will create people like you that push against it mostly due to fear of some kind.

Notable technology breakthrough met with severe skepticism include things like electricity the automobile and vaccines.

There are a very very few manuscript writers left in the world because of the printing press yet here we are nevertheless.

I did not know this. I find duckduckgo to be more useful than Google most times now. It’s crazy how bad Google has become.

Bing? People use Bing?

Ya. When you’re that exhausted don’t drink too much caffeine and definitely lay off the red bulls/monster/nos. They won’t do anything at that point.

Y’all needed a study to find this out! Y’all could have just asked me and saved a whole bunch of time!

I am currently taking a dump… So the entire bathroom door. 🥲

O… Ok! The situation in taking care of itself.

The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge. - Stephen Hawking

The fact that you keep calling llm’s AI simply indicate your ignorance as to what you’re even talking about.

They’re not copying brush Strokes they’re creating their own.

You have no idea how these things work what they are or even what they do you’re just on the bandwagon hating these tools for reasons that you don’t even understand yourself.

If you’re so upset with all this stuff go live in a Luddite community or something.

Copy

1. noun a. an imitation, transcript, or reproduction of an original work (such as a letter, a painting, a table, or a dress) b. one of a series of especially mechanical reproductions of an original impression c. matter to be set especially for printing; also: something considered printable (such as an advertisement or news story)

2. verb a. to make a copy or copies of b. to model oneself on c. to transfer (data, text, etc.) from one location to another, especially in computing

I can’t believe I just had to provide you with a definition of the word copy.

Are you freaking serious!!!

Being inspired by and creating an original production is not the same as copying if that original work is inspired by other artists!!!

By your definition of copying because Elvis Presley was inspired by Muddy Waters they made the exact same music!

LLMs don’t produce copyrighted material they take inspiration from the training data so to speak. They create original productions.

In the same way that you can envision the Mona Lisa in your head but you couldn’t paint it by hand.

Ok. Fine. I’ll bite.

My original comment was about protecting intellectual property from theft, you responded with some bullshit about landlords charging too much rent which has nothing to do with intellectual theft. That is a textbook definition of moving the goal post.

Then you made assumptions about what I may or may not believe or think.

And now in this most recent comment you are asserting something that I did not say. I’m not arguing for or against the disparity in wealth.

Are you going to address my question? How do you propose that people who create intellectual property be compensated for their property? How do you propose you protect these people from intellectual theft? Please refrain from responding with anything other than the answer to this question I want you to propose a mechanism that will protect people from intellectual theft.

ONCE AGAIN THIS IS ABOUT INTELLECTUAL THEFT.

Also stop using the term cognitive dissonance you clearly have no clue what it means.