- 0 Posts
- 63 Comments
30·3 months agoLibrewolf it comes with uBlock installed.
I know they did in december 2021.
https://web.archive.org/web/20211210133430/https://mastodon.social/@protonmail/107421854866115843
0·4 months agoHave you looked at the OpenSearch Description file for your instance? It might be generated with an IP by SearXNG not knowing the hostname. The URL is probably
https://search.home/opensearch.xml.If you want to examine the search engines in your browser profile, they’re stored in a json file compressed with a mozilla specific variant of lz4. The file is
search.json.mozlz4and can be unpacked to json with lz4json.
2·10 months agoThank you.
Interesting that they’ll make it a user choice. Who would answer yes?
On 22 July 2024, Google announced that it is changing its approach to Privacy Sandbox. Instead of removing third-party cookies from Chrome, it will be introducing a user-choice prompt, which will allow users to choose whether to retain third party cookies.
Do you have a source for that excus… uehm… claim?
9·11 months agoThat’s the last stage of being a FOSS developer.
From what I read these articles talk about post infection use of OpenNIC tlds. Anyway it was just a suggestion, it’s always a good idea to only use DNS servers you trust :)
I don’t understand how that would be a security risk to you. Even if I understood what the threat vector was, it would be very inefficient to use an OpenNIC tld to spread malware as you only target 0.0001% (random very low number) of internet users.
You’re in trouble already as a business, wasting a lot of money, if you don’t know where your target audience is. What you argue is that this is used for a business to probe where an advertisement would work. I’d argue that that is a very expensive way of finding your target audience, because you still have to pay for all the ads that didn’t work. There are much better ways of figuring out where your target audience is.
I think most people believe that this obsessive data collection is neccessary, only because Google has repeatedly painted that narrative. This better advertising is just coincidentally the form of advertising that Google is in the best position to supply.
If you carefully pick the places you advertise and do statistics on how it affect your business while a campaign runs I’m willing to bet you get a much better return. As a bonus to saving money you didn’t have to shit on an important principle in democracy, the autonomy of the people, protected by something called privacy.
Did you ironically preserve the utm_source parameter?
I’m not even buying the premise. Any business can look at its bottomline to see if their advertising works. If they can’t, then its not working.
How?
There’s plenty to add from OpenNIC and you get access to some addition TLDs as a bonus ;)
I use the addon Redirector for rewriting urls to youtube etc. to private alternatives. I guess you can use it to rewrite startpage queries.
Unless someone has registered the trademark for those specific purposes you’re clear. A trademarks is only valid within a specific field of purpose. Trademarks are there to avoid consumers mistaking one brand for another.
There are a lot of entertaining articles on Techdirt about companies not understanding trademark law.
I agree and the requirement for an exact placement of attribution is not very friendly to derivate works either. I don’t think that section 7 of AGPL allow adding anything other than the exact terms in section 7 and it has a clause that allow removing non-permissive additions to the AGPL, but I’ve sent an e-mail to FSF asking what their position is. I would be very concerned picking AGPL as a license for my projects, if section 7 allow adding clauses like that. Anyhow the clauses were added in this commit, so anything prior to 7.3.0 is normal AGPL.
There is no free and open source version of Only Office. It fakes that it is licensed with AGPL, but they have added the following to the license, which in effect completely forbid you to redistribute it. It can be said to be Source Available.
The interactive user interfaces in modified source and object code versions of ONLYOFFICE must display Appropriate Legal Notices, as required under Section 5 of the GNU AGPL version 3.
Pursuant to Section 7 § 3(b) of the GNU AGPL you must retain the original ONLYOFFICE logo in the upper left corner of the user interface when distributing the software.
Pursuant to Section 7 § 3(e) we decline to grant you any rights under trademark law for use of our trademarks.
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ONLYOFFICE/DesktopEditors/master/LICENSE
You’re right in pointing out the problems with decentralized message synchronization, though I was only trying to point out the fact that no known technology is capable of real-time messaging unless both parties are online ;)